Senseible

Can our ISO 14064 verification statement be used for CBAM?

No. CBAM accepts only a verification by a verifier accredited for CBAM by an EU national accreditation body, at reasonable assurance, checked against the EU Methodology Act. The Commission says ISO 14064-3 is not specific enough for CBAM. Your ISO work still helps: the meters, invoices and controls behind it are the evidence a CBAM verifier samples.

Side by side

How to tell which assurance you hold

Read the opinion paragraph. Reasonable assurance is worded positively: the statement is free of material misstatement. Limited assurance uses a double negative: nothing has come to our attention that causes us to believe it is misstated. If yours reads like the second, it would not meet CBAM even if everything else matched.

What carries over

What you must add

  1. A monitoring plan that follows the Methodology Act, covering every source stream, each production process and the goods made in it.
  2. Production in tonnes by CN code for the year, counting only goods that meet sale specifications, and the precursors used in each process.
  3. Calendar year totals, with stock taken as close as possible to 31 December.
  4. A verifier accredited for CBAM for your sector. Your ISO verifier may also hold CBAM accreditation; ask for the certificate.

What Senseible does here

Senseible's CBAM Suite starts from the same fuel and electricity records your ISO inventory uses and turns them into the CBAM operator emissions report by production process and CN code. Senseible checks it in-house first, but that is not the CBAM verification: an accredited verifier, one Senseible partners with or your own, signs it off. Senseible does not issue ISO or CBAM verification statements.

Sources: European Commission, Guidance on CBAM verification and accreditation (24 August 2026), sections 1.1 (Figure 1), 3.4, 3.6, 4.1, 4.15 and 7.7, European Commission, CBAM Questions and Answers (15 October 2026), questions 5.2 and 5.7

Last reviewed 2026-10-29.