Senseible

Will energy savings pay the EMI on an energy efficiency loan?

Compare the annual EMI with the measured annual saving in rupees. A saving of at least 1.3 times the EMI, our rule of thumb rather than a bank norm, leaves room for a bad year. Use your own before and after bills, not the vendor's estimate, and test a 30% shortfall.

The EMI side

EMI = P x r x (1 + r)^n / ((1 + r)^n minus 1), where P is the loan, r the monthly interest rate (annual rate / 12) and n the number of months. Multiply by 12 for the annual outflow. Your bank's sanction letter gives the rate and tenure; processing fees and insurance add to the cost.

The savings side

A decision rule

Cover ratio = annual saving / annual EMI. Above about 1.3, a working rule of thumb and not a lender requirement, the project pays its loan with headroom; your bank may apply its own test. Between 1.0 and 1.3, it works only if savings hold every month. Below 1.0, you are paying part of the EMI from other cash; that can still be worth it for reliability or capacity, but decide knowingly. Run the test again with savings 30% lower, because production drops and tariff changes happen.

What the lender wants to see

Lenders size energy efficiency loans on credible savings. An energy audit, quotations, the equipment's rated performance and 12 months of bills for the baseline make the case. After installation, the same bills prove the saving and support the next loan.

Worked example: a compressor and motor upgrade

Interest rate and tariff are illustrative. Use the rate in your sanction letter and your own tariff.

What Senseible does here

Senseible reads your electricity and fuel bills before and after the project, so the baseline and the saving are traceable to source documents, and the green loan readiness check uses that record. It does not set loan terms or approve credit; the lender does.

Sources: CEA CO2 Baseline Database, BEE, investment grade energy audit guidance

Last reviewed 2026-10-17.