Senseible

How much of my carbon credits go into the buffer pool, and why?

Under Verra, a land-based project puts a share of each verification's carbon stock gain into a shared buffer pool, equal to its non-permanence risk rating; a project rated above 60 percent fails. The buffer exists because trees, soil and mangroves can lose stored carbon later, through fire, drought or land clearing.

What the buffer pool is for

A tonne avoided at a chimney stays avoided. A tonne stored in a tree or in soil can go back to the air. Registries handle that risk by holding back part of every land project's credits in a common pool that no one can sell. When any project in the pool loses carbon, the registry cancels buffer credits to cover the loss, so the credits buyers already retired stay whole.

It works like pooled insurance: every project pays a premium in credits, and the pool pays out for the ones that suffer a loss.

What sets your share

What the Indian project types tend to face

Agroforestry on smallholder farms often scores higher on internal and external risk, because thousands of farmers each control their own trees and can cut them. Soil carbon projects depend on farmers keeping the practice going after payments end. Coastal mangrove projects carry cyclone and tidal surge risk on the natural side. Clear farmer agreements, documented land rights and fire or grazing controls are what bring a rating down.

What happens when carbon is lost

Other programmes handle it differently

Gold Standard land-use projects hold back a fixed 20 percent rather than a project-specific rating, and that pool is kept even after the crediting period ends. ICVCM's Core Carbon Principles treat permanence as one of the tests a credit type must pass, so a programme needs some reversal protection, such as a buffer, before its land credits can carry the CCP label.

Illustrative: one verification of an agroforestry project

The rating multiplies only the carbon stock change. Reductions that cannot reverse, such as avoided methane, follow your methodology's own rule. Plan revenue and forward sales on issued credits, not verified tonnes.

What Senseible does here

Senseible does not calculate risk ratings, run a registry or hold buffer credits. Its carbon credit eligibility signals show whether your records look ready for a methodology; they are not credits and not a non-permanence assessment.

Sources: Verra, VCS AFOLU Non-Permanence Risk Tool and VCS Standard (buffer and reversal rules), Gold Standard, Land Use and Forests requirements (reversal buffer), ICVCM, Core Carbon Principles (permanence)

Last reviewed 2026-10-16. Verra revises the Non-Permanence Risk Tool; check the current version for the minimum rating and reversal rules. The above-60 fail line and the Gold Standard 20 percent buffer were checked in October 2026; the 15 percent rating is illustrative.