Senseible

Are process emissions reported separately from fuel combustion in Scope 1?

Both are Scope 1, and the GHG Protocol only requires the Scope 1 total. But you should keep them as separate lines. CBAM installation monitoring treats them as separate source streams, IPCC puts them in different volumes, and buyers and lenders need the split because a fuel switch cuts only the combustion part.

What counts as each

Where each framework draws the line

The tricky case: fuel used as a raw material

Coke used as a reductant in a blast furnace, or natural gas used as feedstock for ammonia, is not burnt mainly for heat. IPCC counts these under industrial processes, not energy. Do not count the same fuel twice: if the coke purchase is already in your process line, leave it out of combustion.

If a stack monitor measures total CO2 from a kiln, report that measured figure once and show the calculated split as a note.

How to lay it out

  1. One line per fuel for combustion, with quantity, factor and source.
  2. One line per process input, such as tonnes of carbonate, purity and factor.
  3. A Scope 1 total that is the sum of both.
  4. Fugitive refrigerant or SF6 leaks on their own line, in CO2e, since they are not CO2.

Worked example: a lime kiln for one year

Purity and the coal factor vary by supplier; use your assay and fuel analysis where you have them.

What Senseible does here

Senseible calculates combustion emissions from your fuel invoices using IPCC 2006 factors. Process emissions are calculated when you supply measured data, such as tonnes of carbonate fed and its assay, and sit on their own line.

Sources: GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, Chapter 4, IPCC 2006 Guidelines, Volume 2 (Energy) and Volume 3 (IPPU), CBAM monitoring rules, Implementing Regulation (EU) 2023/1773 and definitive-period acts

Last reviewed 2026-10-16. CBAM monitoring rules for the definitive period were updated in 2025; check that the source stream split still applies as described.