Senseible

Can a product footprint be based on one month's data, or does it need a full year?

One month is allowed only if you can show it represents the product, and you must state the period. A full year is safer and usually expected, because power use, boiler fuel, product mix and yields change with seasons and orders. Use a month as a labelled provisional figure and replace it when twelve months are in.

What the standards ask

ISO 14067 asks you to state the time period your data cover and to justify that it is representative. The GHG Protocol Product Standard rates data quality on several indicators, including how well the period fits. Neither sets a minimum of one year, but a short period is harder to defend.

Why one month can mislead

When one month is acceptable

  1. New product or new plant with no longer history: use what you have and label it provisional.
  2. Stable, continuous process with little seasonal swing: show two or three other months to prove it.
  3. A buyer deadline: send the month with its dates, mark it provisional, and commit to an annual update.

Building the annual figure

Add twelve months of energy and divide by twelve months of output; do not average twelve monthly footprints, which gives a slow month the same weight as a busy one. Keep the monthly figures too, so you can show the range.

Illustrative month against the year

Figures are illustrative and cover electricity only.

What Senseible does here

Senseible builds records month by month from invoices and bills, so a provisional figure from the first months turns into a twelve-month total as bills come in, with each month's data kept.

Sources: ISO 14067:2018, Carbon footprint of products (time boundary and data quality), GHG Protocol Product Standard (2011), data quality indicators

Last reviewed 2026-10-18.