Senseible

We make the same product in two plants. Do we give the buyer a weighted average or plant-specific footprint?

Give the plant-specific footprint whenever you can tell which plant supplied the buyer's goods. Use a production-weighted average only when shipments genuinely mix output from both plants, and then name the plants, their weights and the period. For EU CBAM goods, embedded emissions are reported per installation, not averaged.

Why plant-specific is better

Two plants on different fuels, grids or machines can differ a lot for the same product. ISO 14067 asks for data that represent the product as supplied. If invoices or batch numbers show the buyer's goods came from Plant B, an average with Plant A misstates them.

When a weighted average is fair

What to disclose with an average

  1. Each plant's footprint and its share of volume.
  2. The period both figures cover.
  3. The method, which must be the same at both plants: same boundary, same factor sources, same allocation.

CBAM is installation-specific

Under the EU CBAM Regulation (EU) 2023/956, Annex IV, embedded emissions are determined for the installation that produced the goods. A cement, steel, aluminium, fertiliser or hydrogen exporter with two plants reports each one's data for the goods it made. Averaging is a product footprint convenience, not a CBAM method.

Illustrative effect of averaging

Figures are illustrative.

What Senseible does here

Senseible can keep invoices and bills for each plant or GSTIN, so each plant's energy total, and the footprint built from it, comes from that plant's own documents.

Sources: ISO 14067:2018, Carbon footprint of products (data representativeness), Regulation (EU) 2023/956 (CBAM), consolidated text, Annex IV

Last reviewed 2026-10-18.