Senseible

What should a buyer's supplier carbon survey format contain?

Twelve items, in the GHG Protocol's supplier engagement guidance: emission sources and scope, boundary, reporting period, activity data and emissions in CO2e, comparability with earlier methods, emission factors and sources, uncertainties, trends, progress to targets, events affecting the data, ratio indicators for allocation, and anything else relevant.

Why a fixed format

The guidance asks for one standard format so answers compare year on year and supplier against supplier, errors fall, and figures can be recalculated the same way later. It also notes that a spreadsheet is easy to send but tiresome for a supplier filling different ones for every customer.

The twelve fields, as an Indian MSME would fill them

Ask in units suppliers already have

A first-time supplier knows its kWh, litres and tonnes, not its CO2e. Ask for both, and you can check the arithmetic yourself. Ask for the financial year they keep books in if your own period differs, with monthly figures so you can recut it.

What goes out before the survey

The guidance tells buyers to send a letter from procurement first, covering:

After the survey goes out

The same guidance recommends a training session, a help desk, periodic check-ins, a clear line on suppliers who do not respond, and a thank-you once data is reviewed. Leave the target and trend fields optional in year one; a supplier answering for the first time rarely has them.

Worked example: why the ratio indicator field matters

Example figures.

What Senseible does here

Suppliers who use Senseible can fill the activity data, emissions and factor fields from their own bills, with the document behind every line.

Sources: GHG Protocol, Supplier Engagement Guidance

Last reviewed 2026-10-31.