Should a growing MSME set an absolute or an intensity emissions target?
Set an absolute target if a buyer, the SBTi or a programme asks for one; the SBTi SME route uses an absolute Scope 1 and 2 target. Track intensity alongside it, because a growing unit can cut emissions per tonne and still see total emissions rise. Many MSMEs publish both.
What each target tells a reader
- Absolute: total tonnes of CO2e in the target year against the base year. It is what the climate sees, and what science-based routes ask for.
- Intensity: tonnes per unit of output, such as t CO2e per tonne of castings or per lakh pieces. It shows efficiency and is fair to a unit that is growing.
- The GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, Chapter 11, describes both and notes that an intensity target can be met while absolute emissions rise.
Who asks for which
- SBTi SME route: an absolute Scope 1 and 2 reduction target under the Corporate Near-Term Criteria. The minimum cut depends on your base and target years; check it on the SBTi site.
- India's CCTS: GHG emission intensity targets, per tonne of product, notified by sector for obligated entities.
- Sustainability-linked loans: either, as written in the facility agreement; intensity is common for growing borrowers.
- Buyers: often absolute for their own Scope 3, but many accept supplier intensity with production data.
A decision rule
- If someone sets the type for you, use it.
- If you plan to grow output fast, set an intensity target for operations and report absolute emissions next to it every year.
- If you can cut absolute emissions through solar, fuel switching or electrification while growing, set an absolute target; it is the stronger claim.
Pick the right denominator
Use a physical unit that tracks the energy you use: tonnes, pieces or kWh delivered. Avoid revenue, which moves with prices and inflation. Keep the same unit and production definition every year.
Illustrative three years of growth
- Base year: 1,000 t CO2; output grows 15% a year; intensity falls 5% a year
- Each year total emissions change by 1.15 x 0.95 = 1.0925, a 9.25% rise
- After three years: 1,000 x 1.0925 x 1.0925 x 1.0925 = 1,304 t CO2
- Intensity after three years: 0.95 x 0.95 x 0.95 = 0.857, about 14.3% lower
- An intensity target is met; an absolute target is missed by a wide margin
Growth and efficiency rates are illustrative.
What Senseible does here
Senseible tracks absolute Scope 1 and 2 emissions from your monthly bills and invoices and shows intensity per unit of output, so both figures come from the same records.
- How ambitious SLL targets should be
- SBTi SME route eligibility
- What 42% by 2030 means
- CCTS intensity targets
Sources: GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (2004), Chapter 11 Setting a GHG target, SBTi SME target validation route (current criteria), BEE, Carbon Credit Trading Scheme, GHG emission intensity targets (2025)
Last reviewed 2026-10-18. SME route absolute Scope 1 and 2 target checked 2026-10-19 (Near-Term Criteria); SBTi SME wording and CCTS sector targets change, so check both before quoting a percentage or year.