Senseible

What are the warning signs in a carbon footprint report from a consultant?

The main warning signs are totals with no activity data behind them, factors with no source or version, a missing boundary, carbon credits subtracted from emissions, spend-based Scope 3 presented as precise, and suspiciously round numbers. Any one of these means you cannot check the figure yourself.

Signs the figures cannot be traced

Signs the boundary is unclear

Signs the result is presented better than it is

How to raise it with the preparer

Ask for the working file: one row per source, with quantity, unit, factor, factor source and result. A sound report can produce this in a day. If the preparer cannot, treat the total as an estimate and say so wherever you use it.

What Senseible does here

Senseible's reports keep the source document, its SHA-256 fingerprint, the quantity and the factor for each line, the kind of trail this checklist asks for. Its figures are self-declared estimates, and a Verified status means its rule checks passed.

Sources: GHG Protocol Corporate Standard, Chapter 1 (accounting principles) and Chapter 9 (reporting), ISO 14064-1:2018, clause 9 (GHG report content)

Last reviewed 2026-10-18.