Senseible

Should work-from-home emissions be counted in Scope 3 Category 7?

Yes, if you count them at all, work-from-home emissions go in Scope 3 Category 7, employee commuting. The GHG Protocol makes them optional. Include them when hybrid work is a large share of your days, or when you report lower commuting from hybrid work, so the saving is not overstated.

Why it is Category 7 and not Scope 2

The GHG Protocol Scope 3 Standard says companies may include emissions from employees teleworking in Category 7. Scope 2 covers electricity the company buys for sites in its own boundary. A home is not in your boundary and the bill is the employee's, so even if you pay a home internet or electricity allowance, the emissions stay in Scope 3.

When to include it

When leaving it out is defensible

If few days are remote, or a screening estimate shows the figure is a small fraction of total Scope 3, you can leave it out. Say so in the methodology note: teleworking excluded, the reason, and the screening figure. Apply the same choice every year so the trend stays comparable.

What does not belong here

Worked example: one remote day against one office day (assumptions labelled)

The car economy, home load and AC hours are assumptions. The point is that counting only the avoided commute can show a saving that is not there in summer.

What Senseible does here

Senseible records the electricity and fuel bills of your own sites. Home electricity of remote staff is not on your bills, so a teleworking estimate is something you calculate and add to your Scope 3 notes.

Sources: GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Standard (2011), Category 7, employee commuting, GHG Protocol Technical Guidance for Calculating Scope 3 Emissions (2013), Category 7, CEA CO2 Baseline Database

Last reviewed 2026-10-17.